26/05/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, We have reviewed your submission, "And now for something completely different," (our manuscript #28787) and determined that it is not appropriate for publication in the American Journal of Physics.  Manuscripts questioning well-established laws of physics are outside the purview of AJP and should be submitted to an archival research journal for consideration. Therefore, I regret to inform you that we will not pursue the publication of your manuscript. Sincerely, David Jackson AMERICAN JOURNAL of PHYSICS David P. Jackson, Editor 31/05/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript #16-0930, "A simple proof that conservation of angular momentum is a fallacy," suitable for publication in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. This is not a mathematical physics paper. Sincerely, Bruno Nachtergaele, Editor 07/06/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript #16-0990, "Conservation of angular momentum regarding an orbiting object with a reducing radius is a fallacy," suitable for publication in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. This is not a mathematical physics paper. JMP is not a suitable venue for it. Sincerely, Bruno Nachtergaele, Editor 13/06/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "Conservation of angular momentum regarding an orbiting object with a reducing radius is a fallacy." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106066 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. To be publishable in this journal, articles must be of high quality and scientific interest, and be recognised as an important contribution to the literature. Your Paper has been assessed and has been found not to meet these criteria. It therefore does not warrant publication in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical and has been withdrawn from consideration. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively and wish you luck in publishing your article elsewhere. Yours sincerely Sarah Whitehouse On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 15/06/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "Conservation of angular momentum does not apply to an orbiting object with a reducing radius." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106085 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Sarah Whitehouse On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 16/06/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, We have reviewed your submission, "Conservation of angular momentum does not apply to an orbiting object with a reducing radius.," (our manuscript #28837) and determined that it is not appropriate for publication in the American Journal of Physics.  I have already informed you that such a manuscript is outside the purview of AJP.  Additional submissions on this topic will be rejected without review.  Please refer to the "Information for Contributors" and the "Statement of Editorial Policy" at the AJP home page http://ajp.dickinson.edu. Therefore, I regret to inform you that we will not pursue the publication of your manuscript. Sincerely, David Jackson AMERICAN JOURNAL of PHYSICS David P. Jackson, Editor 21/06/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript #16-1093, "Conservation of angular momentum is not applicable to a mass orbiting on a tether with a changing radius," suitable for publication in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. Just like the other manuscripts you recently submitted to JMP, this document is not a mathematical physics paper. It will not be considered for publication in this journal and it would be pointless to continue to submit similar manuscripts to JMP. Sincerely, Bruno Nachtergaele, Editor 22/06/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript #16-1107, "One cannot define a property by multiplying momentum with radius and then reasonably expect the magnitude to be conserved when the radius changes," suitable for publication in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. This is not a scientific paper, much less a mathematical physics paper. Perhaps you should look for a discussion group, blog, or other publication dedicated to the Physics Education. Sincerely, Bruno Nachtergaele, Editor 23/06/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "Conservation of angular momentum does not apply to an object orbiting on a tether with a reducing radius." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106124 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Phil Brown On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 23/06/16 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript #16-1109, "Ball on a string," suitable for publication in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. Personally, I am a fan of poetry but JMP is not the place to publish your verse. Also, I should point out that you are not the first person to go through a learning process before understanding angular momentum and the applicability of the associated conservation law correctly. Sincerely, Bruno Nachtergaele, Editor To which I replied: Well if i am not, then why is science still teaching fallacy ? To date no response. **** 30/06/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "If one defines the magnitude of a property to be momentum multiplied by radius then one cannot reasonably expect said magnitude to be conserved when the radius changes." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106148 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Eimear O'Callaghan On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 06/07/16 Re: LU15427    Conservation of angular momentum is not applicable to a mass orbiting    on a tether with a changing radius    by John Mandlbaur Dear Dr. Mandlbaur, Your manuscript has been considered.  We regret to inform you that we have concluded that it is not suitable for publication in any APS journal. Yours sincerely, Jane Throwe Associate Editor Physical Review Letters 08/07/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "The conservation of angular momentum fallacy." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106216 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Eimear O'Callaghan On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 11-Jul-2016 Dear Mr Mandlbaur I am writing to you regarding your manuscript RSPA-2016-0531 entitled "Conservation of angular momentum does not apply to any situation wherein the radius changes" which you submitted to the Proceedings A. Unfortunately your manuscript is not suitable for Proceedings A, and so we are unable to consider your manuscript further. Thank you for considering Proceedings A for the publication of your research. Yours sincerely Raminder Shergill proceedingsa@royalsociety.org 11/07/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "If one defines the magnitude of a property to be momentum multiplied by radius then one cannot reasonably expect said magnitude to be conserved when the radius changes." by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-106148 Thank you for your response to our decision on your submission. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical is a major journal of theoretical and mathematical physics which publishes original work making a significant advance in its field. The journal publishes mathematically rich work on the structures underlying fundamental physical processes and the analytical, computational and numerical methods for exploring these structures. Papers submitted to the journal are expected to be placed within the context of current scientific literature on their subject and should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour. A careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions drawn within the context of current scientific research is also expected. Your submission was assessed by the journal editors who did not believe that it met these key criteria for consideration by the journal and we were therefore unable to consider it further. We are sorry we cannot be more helpful and thank you for your interest in the journal. Yours sincerely Lucy Joy On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Sarah Whitehouse - Editor 25/08/16 Dear John Mandlbaur, Thank you very much for submitting your article ‘Conservation of Angular Momentum is a Fallacy’ to Philosophy. I have considered it carefully, but I am afraid that in the end I decided that I could not use it.  As you are no doubt aware, a very large number of submissions come to Philosophy.  In choosing what to publish, as well as the individual articles submitted I also have to consider the balance and make-up of each issue.  In Philosophy we attempt to cover the whole range of philosophy in a way which is not too tightly focused.  This means that many worthwhile articles which may well find acceptance in other journals have to be turned down.  I do hope that you have better luck with your article elsewhere.  Yours sincerely,    Anthony O'Hear (Director and Editor of Philosophy)  30/08/16 Dear Dr. Mandlbaur, After checking Research Article 8205462 titled "Angular momentum is not conserved in systems with variable radii" by John Mandlbaur, I regret to inform you that it was found to be unsuitable for publication in Physics Research International. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Physics Research International. Best regards, Aya Ahmed Editorial Office Hindawi Publishing Corporation 31/08/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Angular momentum is not conserved in systems with variable radii" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 07/09/16 Re: LV15358    Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems    by J. H. Mandlbaur Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, Your manuscript has been considered.  We regret to inform you that we have concluded that it is not suitable for publication in Physical Review Letters. Yours sincerely, Sonja Grondalski Associate Editor Physical Review Letters 15/09/16 Dear Mr John Herbert Mandlbaur, I am sorry to inform you that your submission entitled "Conservation of angular momentum does not apply to an object orbiting on a tether with a reducing radius." will not be considered for publication in Open Physics and will be removed. Unfortunately, due to a limited space for manuscripts to be published, our editorial selection criteria have become very strict and we can only accept the best manuscripts of those submitted. Thank you for submitting your work to our journal. Kind regards, Paulina Lesna-Szreter, Ph.D. Managing Editor 19/09/16 Re: LV15358R    Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems    by J. H. Mandlbaur Dear J.H. Mandlbaur, Your manuscript has been considered.  We regret to inform you that we have concluded that it is not suitable for publication in any APS journal. Yours sincerely, Debbie Brodbar Journal Manager Reviews of Modern Physics 20/09/16 I am afraid that Contemporary Physics only publishes commissioned articles reviewing broad areas of current physics, ones which are commissioned by the Editorial Board and not original or very technical research articles.  You may not know the kind of article we encourage in our Journal: it should be aimed at a non-specialist but intelligent physics audience which I always take to mean good final-year undergraduates.  We prefer to stress the basic principles in our articles rather than the formalism, rather like say Physics Today or Physics World articles but at a little more length and technical detail. But we do insist on accessibility.  I am afraid we are unable to consider your proposal which really does not fit the commissioned criterion.   I am sorry we are unable to help, yours sincerely Peter Knight ------------------------------------ Sir Peter Knight FRS   Senior Research Investigator Blackett Lab, Imperial College London SW7 2AZ and Chair of the Quantum Metrology Institute, National Physical Laboratory 21/09/16 Dear Dr. John Herbert Mandlbaur, This message regards your paper No: 1609-018. We regret to inform you that, after due consideration, your paper has been deemed unsuitable for publication in Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics by the Editorial Board. Sincerely yours, PTEP Editorial Office 22/09/16 Ref: CMAME_2016_879 Title: Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems Journal: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.  Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering publishes original papers at the forefront of modern research describing significant developments of computational methods in solving important problems of applied mechanics and engineering.  I believe your paper is very interesting but does not satisfy the requirements of publication of the Journal.  I suggest you send it to another venue. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Kind regards, Prof Hughes Editor Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 22/09/16 22-Sep-2016 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, I write you in regards to Manuscript ID prop.201600093 entitled "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" which you submitted to Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics. I am sorry I have to report that your manuscript has been denied publication in Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics for the following reason: The subject and the form of your article do not comply with the character of our journal. Thank you for considering Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics for the publication of your research.  I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from submitting future manuscripts. Sincerely, Dr. Hans-Jörg Otto Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics 22/09/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, With regret, I must inform you that the Editor has decided that your manuscript: "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" cannot be accepted for publication in Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik. This paper does not fit into the scope of ZAMP. We would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication. Best regards, Springer Journals Editorial Office Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik 23/09/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 03/10/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems". Regretfully, we cannot publish it in Nature Communications. It is our policy to decline a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees so that they may be sent elsewhere without further delay. Such decisions are made by the editorial staff when it appears that papers do not meet the criteria for publication in Nature Communications. Among the considerations that arise at this stage are the likelihood that the manuscript would seem of considerable interest to those working in the same area of science and the degree to which the results will stimulate new thinking in the field. In this case, while we do not question the validity of your work, I am afraid we are not persuaded that your findings represent a sufficiently striking advance to justify publication in Nature Communications. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion and thank you for the opportunity to consider your work. Best regards, Dr Federico Levi 07/10/16 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 17/10/2016 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "A thought experiment indicates that a classic physics demonstration is invalid" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 18/10/2016 18-Oct-2016 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur: Thanks for your contribution. I write you in regards to manuscript # FOP-2016-0148 entitled "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" which you submitted to the Frontiers of Physics. After careful evaluation of the manuscript, we regret to inform you that the writing is clear but we still think this paper is not proper to publish in this journal. Therefore, we do not want to delay this decision again and wish you success in submission of the manuscript to another journal. Thank you for considering the Frontiers of Physics for the publication of your research.  I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Frontiers of Physics Editorial Office 15/11/2016 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 01/02/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur: I write you in regards to manuscript # RSOS-170086 entitled "A thought experiment indicates that a classic physics demonstration is invalid" which you submitted to Royal Society Open Science. In light of the appropriateness of your manuscript for our journal, your manuscript has been denied publication in Royal Society Open Science. Thank you for considering Royal Society Open Science for the publication of your research. Regards, Alice Power Royal Society Open Science 28/02/2017 Re: LV15358R Angular momentum is not conserved in variable radii systems by J. H. Mandlbaur Dear J.H. Mandlbaur, Your manuscript has been considered. We regret to inform you that we have concluded that it is not suitable for publication in any APS journal. Yours sincerely, Debbie Brodbar Journal Manager Reviews of Modern Physics 20/03/2017 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur: Thanks for your contribution. I write you in regards to manuscript # FOP-2017-0055 entitled "In the equation L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which of the remaining variables is correctly conserved ?" which you submitted to the Frontiers of Physics. After careful evaluation of the manuscript, we regret to inform you that the writing is clear but we still think this paper is not proper to publish in this journal. Therefore, we do not want to delay this decision again and wish you success in submission of the manuscript to another journal. Thank you for considering the Frontiers of Physics for the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Frontiers of Physics Editorial Office 29/03/2017 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur: Thanks for your contribution. I write you in regards to manuscript # FOP-2017-0048 entitled "A thought experiment indicates that a classic physics demonstration is invalid" which you submitted to the Frontiers of Physics. After careful evaluation of the manuscript, we regret to inform you that the writing is clear but we still think this paper is not proper to publish in this journal. Therefore, we do not want to delay this decision again and wish you success in submission of the manuscript to another journal. Thank you for considering the Frontiers of Physics for the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Frontiers of Physics Editorial Office 01/06/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "In the equation L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which of the remaining variables is correctly conserved ?" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 05/06/2017 Re: RF10087 In the angular momentum equation, L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which one of the remaining variables is correctly conserved ? by John Mandlbaur Dear John Mandlbaur, Your manuscript has been considered. We regret to inform you that we have concluded that it is not suitable for publication in any APS journal. Yours sincerely, Debbie Brodbar Journal Manager Reviews of Modern Physics 21/06/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "In the angular momentum equation, L = r x p, when the magnitude of the radius changes, which one of the remaining variable’s magnitude is correctly conserved ?" by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-108324 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Eimear O'Callaghan On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: 14/07/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "Orbital Rotation" by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: JPhysA-108511 Thank you for your submission to Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. We have assessed your manuscript and have considered its suitability for the journal very carefully. We regret to inform you that your article will not be considered for review as it does not meet our strict publication criteria. The quality and presentation of any research published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical must be of the highest standard. Submissions should clearly demonstrate scientific rigour, extensive literature research and a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented in the manuscript. Your manuscript does not meet these key publication criteria and we are unable to consider it further. We are grateful for your interest in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. Yours sincerely Thomas Farrell On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: 10/07/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur: Thank you for submitting your manuscript RSPA-2017-0448 entitled "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which remaining variable’s magnitude is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" to Proceedings A. All manuscripts are assessed by a member of the Editorial Board, who advises the Editor on the suitability of the manuscript for Proceedings A. Based on this, the Editor decides whether the manuscript should be rejected or sent for full peer review. Unfortunately, your manuscript has been rejected at this stage of the assessment process. Competition for space is currently severe, and we receive many more manuscripts than we are able to publish. On this occasion the Editor felt that your manuscript was unlikely to be able to compete successfully for a space in the journal. Please find below comments concerning your manuscript. I hope you may find these useful should you wish to submit your manuscript elsewhere. If you have any queries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely Raminder Shergill proceedingsa@royalsociety.org Board Member: Comments to Author(s): The paper does not take a form of academic papers. The content is poor. I do not think that this is appropriate for publication. Note that this paper was professionally edited and the response when I sent it back to American Manuscript Editors was “I do not find any major issues with the text with exception to one mishandling of a plural possessive in the title.“ - Jennifer Lawrence - Editor in Chief 02/08/2017 Dear Mr John Mandlbaur, Your paper has been reviewed and based on reviewers comments the editor of the respective field has decided that it cannot be approved for publication. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely Paulina Lesna-Szreter, Ph.D. Managing Editor Open Physics 21/08/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur Re: MN-17-2952-L entitled "Orbital motion" submitted to Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. I regret to inform you that your above submission is considered unsuitable for publication in MNRAS due to it not adhering to the format required for MNRAS, its lack of references to the published scientific literature, and it falling short of the standards of an international journal in both scientific content and presentation. I am sorry to disappoint you on this occasion, but we are unable to give your manuscript any further consideration. Regards, Morgan Hollis 21/08/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables’ magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: ROPP-100987 Thank you for your submission to Reports on Progress in Physics. To be publishable in this journal, articles must be of high quality and scientific interest, and be recognised as an important contribution to the literature. Your Review Article has been assessed and has been found not to meet these criteria. It therefore does not warrant publication in Reports on Progress in Physics and has been withdrawn from consideration. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively and wish you luck in publishing your article elsewhere. Yours sincerely Stephanie White On behalf of the IOP peer review team: 14/07/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Orbital motion" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics 03/08/2017 Dear John, Thank you for your submission. Please be advised, however, that ours is a history journal and does not publish scientific papers. We must therefore reject it on those grounds. Best regards, Joseph D. Martin Managing Editor, Physics in Perspective 05/08/2017 Mr John Herbert Mandlbaur: An initial review of "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables’ magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" has made it clear that this submission does not fit within the scope and focus of The International Journal of Multiphysics. I recommend that you consult the description of this journal under About, as well as its current contents, to learn more about the work that we publish. You might also consider submitting this manuscript to another, more suitable journal. MULTIPHYSICS Editor 05/08/2017 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Physical Communication. I regret to inform you that your manuscript does not fit within the scope of the journal and we must therefore reject it. I am sorry to disappoint you with this decision and hope that you will be able to successfully submit your manuscript elsewhere. If you want to find an alternative, you can use our Journal Finder to search for other journals that could be better suited for publishing your manuscript. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Kind regards, Professor Tolga M. Duman Editor-in-Chief Physical Communication 08/08/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur,, I have read your manuscript, JTAP-D-17-00163 "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables' magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" With regret, I must inform you that I have decided that your paper cannot be accepted for publication in Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics. Below, please find the comments for your perusal. I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication. With kind regards, Davoud Dorranian Editor in Chief Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics Your manuscript has been considered by JTAP editorial board. We conclude that it is not suited for JTAP. Note that we make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your work; however, we think that the content is not appropriate for our journal. Topic of the work is in the edge of JTAP scope and is not interesting for our readers. Furthermore we are not going to publish theoretical manuscripts in which there is not any comparison between theoretical results with experimental data. 12/10/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Re: "Orbital motion" by Mandlbaur, John Article reference: EJP-103186 Thank you for your submission to European Journal of Physics. Unfortunately the content of your Paper is not within the scope of the journal. Your manuscript has therefore been withdrawn from consideration. Please note that European Journal of Physics is a pedagogical journal and not a traditional research journal; it is dedicated to maintaining and improving the standard of taught physics in universities and other higher education institutes. All articles must therefore contain content that is applicable to the teaching of physics at university level. If you would like to see a copy of the journal scope please visit the journal web page at http://iopscience.iop.org/0143-0807/page/Scope. We would like to thank you for your interest in European Journal of Physics. Yours sincerely Stephanie White On behalf of the IOP peer-review team: Jessica Thorn - Editor Dr Stephanie White – Associate Editor Lucy Joy – Editorial Assistant 22/08/2017 Ref: RINP_2017_1907 Title: In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables’ magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes? Journal: Results in Physics Dear Mr. Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Results in Physics. After discussing with other colleagues, we find your paper is not suitable to be considered for publication in RINP. Note, this decision does not mean we have made any judgement on the scientific correctness of your work.  Thank you for your understanding. We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal. Kind regards, Cong-Feng Qiao Editor in Chief Results in Physics 01-Dec-2017 Dear Mr. Mandlbaur: I write you in regards to manuscript # cjp-2017-0805 entitled "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables’ magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" which you submitted to the Canadian Journal of Physics. In view of the comments of the reviewer(s) and/or associate editor, found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in the Canadian Journal of Physics. Thank you for considering the Canadian Journal of Physics for the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Dr. Michael Steinitz Editor in Chief, Canadian Journal of Physics To provide us with feedback on your review experience, complete our Peer Review survey at this link: http://www.cdnsciencepub.com/learning-centre/impact-and-discovery/Peer-Review-Survey-2.aspx Associate Editor Comments to the Author: I do not think the manuscript should be published. The `proof' given by the author is not transparent at all, in my opinion. The author describes a time-dependent problem (varying force in a radial direction acting on a particle rotating around a central point). However, his arguments involve a purely static reasoning. For example, Premise 4 is not analyzed with enough precision since the radius is a time-dependent vector in space. 6/12/2017 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, I have received the decision from the Editor on your manuscript, IJTP-D-17-00985 "In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables' magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes?" We thank you for your kind offer to let us publish your manuscript,but regret to inform you that we have decided not to accept your offer. The paper did not undergo technical review and is not being declined for any technical error. We wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication. With best regards, H. Saller Editor in Chief International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24/12/2017 Dear Dr. John Mandlbaur, On behalf of the International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (IJAA) Editorial Board (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijaa), we are sorry to inform you that your manuscript is not accepted by our journal. The referees' comments are as follows: Paper ID: 4500723 Paper Title: In the angular momentum equation L = r x p, which one of the remaining variables’ magnitudes is correctly conserved when the magnitude of the radius changes? Comments: 1.The manuscript is too short. 2.The main text could be found here: https://www.physicsoverflow.org/39550/remaining-variables-magnitudes-correctly-conserved-magnitude After careful consideration, International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics might not be an appropriate journal for its publication.  Thank you for considering International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics for the publication of your research. We hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Please feel free to ask us if you have any question. Best regards, Jane GAO Editorial Assistant of IJAA Scientific Research Publishing 19/02/2018 PONE-D-18-05072 A thought experiment indicates that a classic physics demonstration is invalid PLOS ONE Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript for review by PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, I regret to inform you that we have decided that your submission is not suitable for publication by PLOS ONE.    Please note that PLOS ONE has been specifically designed for the publication of the results of primary scientific research that address a clearly defined research question, and that experiments, statistics, and other analyses must be performed to a high technical standard and described in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce the experiments described. (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication#loc-3). We are concerned that your submission does not meet these criteria, for example, you have not provided sufficient details of your calculations or assumptions for another researcher to replicate your work. In additon, you have not provided a full context of your work in light of other research in this area. Furthermore, please note that many of the conclusions presented in this manuscript have not been adequately backed up by data or references, meaning that the work does not meet publication criterion #4, which states that conclusions must be presented in an appropriate fashion and be supported by the data (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication#loc-4). For example, you mention detractors to your argument, without giving any citation as to who the detractors are, or details of their arguments. In light of the concerns outlined above I am afraid that we cannot consider this submission further. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion but hope that you can understand the basis for this decision. Yours sincerely, Victoria Black               Staff Editor PLOS ONE 26/02/2018 Dear Mr Mandlbaur,   We are pleased to let you know that your submission Angular momentum is not conserved has now passed all checks.   NEXT STEPS Your manuscript has been given to your Transfer Coordinator, who will analyse your submission and be in touch with recommended journals.   Please let us know if you have any questions.   With kind regards,   Veena Kulkarni Transfer Desk Team 08/03/2018 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, We have analyzed your manuscript and used our advanced algorithms to match your manuscript against all Springer and BioMed Central journals.   With regret, I must inform you that we cannot consider your manuscript any further as we could not identify any suitable journals in our portfolio that matched your manuscript.  Please be assured that this is not a comment on the quality of your manuscript.   We wish you every success with your manuscript and we sincerely hope that you will find a suitable home for your work.   With kind regards,   Carola Vermeeren Transfer Coordinator 15/03/2018 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, The Editors have discussed your paper, but they feel that it is unsuitable for ARMA. For this reason, we will not be able to publish your manuscript. Yours sincerely Kurt Ballstadt Managing Editor Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 21/03/2018 Dear Mr Mandlbaur, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "Angular momentum is not conserved" which we are regretfully unable to offer to publish. It is Nature Physics' policy to return a substantial proportion of manuscripts without sending them to referees. Decisions of this kind are made by the editors of Nature Physics according to the demanding editorial criteria of the journal. In the present case, while your findings may well prove stimulating to others' thinking about such questions, we regret that we are unable to conclude that the work provides the sort of firm advance in general understanding that would warrant publication in Nature Physics. We are sorry that we cannot respond more positively on this occasion. Regards, Nature Physics